Boussinesq Vertical Stress Distribution

Computes vertical stress increase Δσz due to different surface loads using Boussinesq's solution. Available modes: **Point Load**, **Circular UDL**, **Rectangular UDL**, **Strip UDL**.

Inputs

Current units: SI — Q in kN, q in kPa, distances in m, stresses in kPa.

Point load Q at surface, vertical stress at depth z and radial distance r.

Stress is computed on the axis below the centre of a flexible circular area: Δσz = q [1 − (1 + (R/z)²)−3/2].

Stress is computed beneath the centre of a flexible rectangle B×L by numerically integrating the point‑load Boussinesq solution over the loaded area.

Stress is computed using the Boussinesq solution for a strip load, assuming the strip is sufficiently long.

Summary

Enter load, geometry, and depth range, then click Compute profile to see vertical stress vs depth, and download the table or PDF.

Profile, table & exports

Boussinesq vertical stress profile
Depth z r/z IB Δσz
No results yet.
Boussinesq point load diagram
Representative diagram: surface point load Q and stress Δσz at depth z and radial distance r.

Theory and Formulas

Boussinesq's Method for Vertical Stress Distribution:
The stress at a depth z and radial distance r below a point load is given by Boussinesq's solution for a semi‑infinite, homogeneous, isotropic elastic mass. The general formula is:

σz = Q / z2 × IB

where IB = (3 / 2π) × 1 / [1 + (r/z)2]5/2.
      

For Circular UDL:
The vertical stress at a depth z below a uniformly loaded circular area of radius R is calculated as:

σz = q × (1 - 1 / [1 + (R/z)2]3/2)
      

For Rectangular UDL (Centre):
The vertical stress beneath the centre of a uniformly loaded rectangular area B × L is calculated using the numerical integration of point load solutions:

σz = q × I2(B/z, L/z)
      

For Strip UDL:
The vertical stress beneath a sufficiently long strip is approximated using a Boussinesq solution for a strip load.

These methods assume homogeneous, isotropic, and weightless soil conditions. Stresses due to self‑weight of the soil are typically neglected unless explicitly accounted for.